By Chris Thoma

USA

I have recently developed a theory called "C. R. Thoma's Law of Circles". Now I have spent approximately 7 years formulating my prognosis regarding my in-depth analysis pertaining to my "Law of Circles".

The foundation of my theory is built around the basic principle that distance is not relative to the point, as it is relative to the directional path. The "Law of Circles" is a theory that constructs a unit of measurement in a sense that distance is determined upon placement of the circle rather than the commonly used straight line.

For example, let's say that person A and person B fall upon a circle's directional path, and that person A makes the assumption that person B is closer to a relative point. Although person B may be closer in relation to the point along the path of a straight line, it doesn't necessarily mean that person B is closer. It person A and person B were to travel along the circle's directional path, then person B is some cases could be more distant from the point.

It is rather difficult to explain without a visual diagram, however I can assure you this theory is logical to the highest degree. I have spent many years constructing and testing to ensure that this theory is a legitimate standard of direction. Deductive reasoning has proven that there is no known source to disprove my "Law of Circles". If you would be so kind as to provide me with some feedback pertaining to my "Law of Circles" I would greatly appreciate it. I am almost positive that this theory will be printed in educational text-books nationwide, as I firmly believe that this "Law" will lay down the foundation for the science of the future.